Cohen & Steers

NYS:CNS

Investment Managers

Market Cap

$2.28bn

SMALL cap

Share Price ↑

$48.47 (0.41%)

YTD Return ↑

41.4576%

since start of 2019

P/E Ratio

20.20

CNS chart by TradingView

Source: FactSet financial data and analytics.

Corporate Values

Carbon Footprint
Pollution Prevention
Water Conservation
Data Privacy
Consumer Health
Employee Satisfaction
Workplace Safety
Corp Gov
Ethical Practices
Conflict Materials
Forced Labor
Gender Diversity

Legend

About

Investment Managers Founded 1986

Cohen & Steers, Inc. is a holding company which operates as an investment manager specializing in liquid real assets, which include real estate securities, listed infrastructure, commodities, natural resource equities, preferred securities, and other income solutions. It manages investment vehicles, such as institutional accounts, open-end funds, and closed-end funds. The company was founded by Martin Cohen and Robert Hamilton Steers in 1986 and is headquartered in New York, NY.

website

Source: FactSet Research Systems

Headquarters

280 Park Avenue

10th floor

New York, NY 10017-1216

1.212.832.3232

Executives

Name	Title	Gender
Adam M. Derechin, CFA, MBA	Chief Operating Officer	Male
Francis C. Poli	Executive Vice President & General Counsel	Male
Robert Hamilton Steers, MBA	Chief Executive Officer & Director	Male
Martin Cohen, MBA	Chairman	Male
Joseph Martin Harvey	President & Chief Investment Officer	Male
Matthew Scott Stadler, CPA	CFO, Executive VP & Investor Relations Contact	Male

Mindful Investing Summary

Legend

Carbon Footprint — N/A

Cohen & Steers among its competitors for its carbon footprint. A company’s performance in this category is based on its success in implementing energy efficiency measures. Investments in energy efficient technology, green building and sourcing of renewable energy can all lead to cost savings and reduce the company’s contribution to climate change.
Pollution Prevention — N/A

Cohen & Steers on this issue. Companies are evaluated on pollution prevention by the levels of waste (including hazardous waste) they produce and release into the environment, and can be affected by whether they develop products that can reduce exposure to pollution.
Water Conservation — N/A

Cohen & Steers among its peers in this category. A company’s score in this category depends on its measures to minimize water usage and impacts on stressed or drought-prone water resources.
Data & Privacy Protection — N/A

Cohen & Steers among its peers and competitors for data privacy and protection. Companies today digitally manage vast amounts of personal information about their clients. A company’s score on this issue is based on the systems, products and procedures it has in place to minimize the risk for data and privacy breaches.
Consumer Health, Wellness & Safety — N/A

Cohen & Steers compared to its peers and competitors Companies in this category manage its product and safety risks.
Employee Ownership, Satisfaction, Benefits & Pay — N/A

Cohen & Steers among its peers for employee satisfaction and pay. A company’s score on this issue depends on its frequency and likelihood of labor disputes as well as its practices to keep and retain talent - such as compensation, family leave, employee health care and other benefits. Employers that are rated as good to work for consistently produce higher stock returns than their peers.
Workplace Health and Safety — N/A

Cohen & Steers among its competitors on this issue. A company’s workplace health and safety is evaluated not only by the number of accidents and injuries in the workplace, but also by their safety policies, training procedures, and their investment in equipment that can reduce accidents.
Integrity of Corporate Governance — N/A

Cohen & Steers among its competitors on corporate governance. This score is determined by the company’s accounting practices, executive pay, board organization and ownership structure.
Ethical Practices — N/A

Cohen & Steers compared to its peers and competitors. A company’s rating on this issue is based on its history of controversies related to unethical corporate behavior, such as false claims about their products, price fixing, executive misconduct, insider trading or fraudulent practices.
Usage of Conflict Materials — N/A

Cohen & Steers among its competitors in this category. Certain products use raw materials that are commonly sourced from militias or other organizations that promote or engage in conflict in their region. To perform well in this category companies must provide adequate assurances that any of these metals used in their production are in fact from conflict-free sources.
Forced Labor — N/A

Cohen & Steers compared to its competitors on forced labor. A company’s score on this issue depends on its use of forced labor and on its work conditions for outsourced labor.
Diversity of Corporate Leadership 2 N/A

Cohen & Steers performs poorly based on its peers as well as companies in similar geographic regions. Companies are assessed on factors such as board diversity and senior management diversity. Companies performing well on this issue typically are more profitable than its peers, while companies with very poor scores typically have greater stock price volatility and lower returns on capital.

Cohen & Steers - Competitors and Related Companies

How Cohen & Steers stacks up to its peers in the Investment Managers industry or with competing business segments.

Cohen & Steers

NYS:CNS

Investment Managers

Market Cap

$2.28bn

SMALL cap

Share Price ↑

$48.47 (0.41%)

YTD Return ↑

41.4576%

since start of 2019

P/E Ratio

20.20

CNS chart by TradingView

Source: FactSet financial data and analytics.

Corporate Values

Carbon Footprint
Pollution Prevention
Water Conservation
Data Privacy
Consumer Health
Employee Satisfaction
Workplace Safety
Corp Gov
Ethical Practices
Conflict Materials
Forced Labor
Gender Diversity

Legend

Loading…