EchoStar

NAS:SATS

Telecommunications Equipment

Market Cap

$3.78bn

MID cap

Share Price ↓

$39.41 (-0.67%)

YTD Return ↑

7.5339%

since start of 2019

P/E Ratio

—

SATS chart by TradingView

Source: FactSet financial data and analytics.

Corporate Values

Carbon Footprint
Pollution Prevention
Water Conservation
Data Privacy
Consumer Health
Employee Satisfaction
Workplace Safety
Corp Gov
Ethical Practices
Conflict Materials
Forced Labor
Gender Diversity

Legend

About

Telecommunications Equipment Founded 2007

EchoStar Corp. engages in the design, development, and distribution of digital set-top boxes and products for direct-to-home satellite service providers. It operates through the following business segments: Hughes, and EchoStar Satellite Services. The Hughes segment provides broadband satellite technologies and broadband services to home and small office customers and network technologies, managed services, and communication solutions. The ESS segment owns and leases in-orbit satellites and licenses to lease capacity on a full time and occasional use. The company was founded by Charlie William Ergen in October 2007 and is headquartered in Englewood, CO.

website

Source: FactSet Research Systems

Headquarters

100 Inverness Terrace East

Englewood, CO 80112-5308

1.303.706.4000

Executives

Name	Title	Gender
Charles William Ergen, MBA	Executive Chairman	Male
Michael T. Dugan	President, Chief Executive Officer & Director	Male
Dean A. Manson	Secretary, Executive VP & General Counsel	Male
Kranti Kilaru	Executive VP-Information Technology & Operations	Male
David J. Rayner, CPA	CFO, COO, Treasurer & Executive VP	Male
Sandra L. Kerentoff	Executive Vice President-Global Human Resources	Female

Mindful Investing Summary

Legend

Carbon Footprint — N/A

EchoStar among its competitors for its carbon footprint. A company’s performance in this category is based on its success in implementing energy efficiency measures. Investments in energy efficient technology, green building and sourcing of renewable energy can all lead to cost savings and reduce the company’s contribution to climate change.
Pollution Prevention — N/A

EchoStar on this issue. Companies are evaluated on pollution prevention by the levels of waste (including hazardous waste) they produce and release into the environment, and can be affected by whether they develop products that can reduce exposure to pollution.
Water Conservation — N/A

EchoStar among its peers in this category. A company’s score in this category depends on its measures to minimize water usage and impacts on stressed or drought-prone water resources.
Data & Privacy Protection — N/A

EchoStar among its peers and competitors for data privacy and protection. Companies today digitally manage vast amounts of personal information about their clients. A company’s score on this issue is based on the systems, products and procedures it has in place to minimize the risk for data and privacy breaches.
Consumer Health, Wellness & Safety — N/A

EchoStar compared to its peers and competitors Companies in this category manage its product and safety risks.
Employee Ownership, Satisfaction, Benefits & Pay — N/A

EchoStar among its peers for employee satisfaction and pay. A company’s score on this issue depends on its frequency and likelihood of labor disputes as well as its practices to keep and retain talent - such as compensation, family leave, employee health care and other benefits. Employers that are rated as good to work for consistently produce higher stock returns than their peers.
Workplace Health and Safety — N/A

EchoStar among its competitors on this issue. A company’s workplace health and safety is evaluated not only by the number of accidents and injuries in the workplace, but also by their safety policies, training procedures, and their investment in equipment that can reduce accidents.
Integrity of Corporate Governance — N/A

EchoStar among its competitors on corporate governance. This score is determined by the company’s accounting practices, executive pay, board organization and ownership structure.
Ethical Practices — N/A

EchoStar compared to its peers and competitors. A company’s rating on this issue is based on its history of controversies related to unethical corporate behavior, such as false claims about their products, price fixing, executive misconduct, insider trading or fraudulent practices.
Usage of Conflict Materials — N/A

EchoStar among its competitors in this category. Certain products use raw materials that are commonly sourced from militias or other organizations that promote or engage in conflict in their region. To perform well in this category companies must provide adequate assurances that any of these metals used in their production are in fact from conflict-free sources.
Forced Labor — N/A

EchoStar compared to its competitors on forced labor. A company’s score on this issue depends on its use of forced labor and on its work conditions for outsourced labor.
Diversity of Corporate Leadership 1 N/A

EchoStar performs very poorly based on its peers as well as companies in similar geographic regions. Companies are assessed on factors such as board diversity and senior management diversity. Companies performing well on this issue typically are more profitable than its peers, while companies with very poor scores typically have greater stock price volatility and lower returns on capital.

EchoStar - Competitors and Related Companies

How EchoStar stacks up to its peers in the Telecommunications Equipment industry or with competing business segments.

EchoStar

NAS:SATS

Telecommunications Equipment

Market Cap

$3.78bn

MID cap

Share Price ↓

$39.41 (-0.67%)

YTD Return ↑

7.5339%

since start of 2019

P/E Ratio

—

SATS chart by TradingView

Source: FactSet financial data and analytics.

Corporate Values

Carbon Footprint
Pollution Prevention
Water Conservation
Data Privacy
Consumer Health
Employee Satisfaction
Workplace Safety
Corp Gov
Ethical Practices
Conflict Materials
Forced Labor
Gender Diversity

Legend

Loading…