First Foundation

NAS:FFWM

Regional Banks

Market Cap

—

SMALL cap

Share Price ←

(—)

YTD Return ←

—

since start of 2019

P/E Ratio

—

FFWM chart by TradingView

Source: FactSet financial data and analytics.

Corporate Values

Carbon Footprint
Pollution Prevention
Water Conservation
Data Privacy
Consumer Health
Employee Satisfaction
Workplace Safety
Corp Gov
Ethical Practices
Conflict Materials
Forced Labor
Gender Diversity

Legend

About

Regional Banks Founded 1990

First Foundation, Inc. is a financial services company, which provides a comprehensive platform of personalized financial services to individuals, businesses and other organizations. It provides investment advisory and wealth management services, banking products and services, trust services, life and property and casualty insurance services. The company operates through the following segments: Banking and Investment Management & Wealth Planning. The Banking segment offers trust management, depository accounts, commercial lending, consulting and other services. The Investment Management & Wealth Planning segment offers wealth consulting services that included estate planning, philanthropic guidance and investment management for individuals and families. First Foundation was founded by John Avak Hakopian and Ulrich Emanuel Keller, Jr. in 1990 and is headquartered in Irvine, CA.

website

Source: FactSet Research Systems

Headquarters

18101 Von Karman Avenue

Suite 700

Irvine, CA 92612-0145

1.949.202.4160

Executives

Name	Title	Gender
John Avak Hakopian, MBA	Director	Male
Rick Keller, Jr.	Executive Chairman	Male
Scott Farris Kavanaugh, MBA	Vice Chairman & Chief Executive Officer	Male
John Matthias Michel, CPA	CFO, Executive VP & Head-Investor Relations	Male
Carrie L. Huntley	Senior Vice President & Administrative Director	Female

Mindful Investing Summary

Legend

Carbon Footprint — N/A

First Foundation among its competitors for its carbon footprint. A company’s performance in this category is based on its success in implementing energy efficiency measures. Investments in energy efficient technology, green building and sourcing of renewable energy can all lead to cost savings and reduce the company’s contribution to climate change.
Pollution Prevention — N/A

First Foundation on this issue. Companies are evaluated on pollution prevention by the levels of waste (including hazardous waste) they produce and release into the environment, and can be affected by whether they develop products that can reduce exposure to pollution.
Water Conservation — N/A

First Foundation among its peers in this category. A company’s score in this category depends on its measures to minimize water usage and impacts on stressed or drought-prone water resources.
Data & Privacy Protection — N/A

First Foundation among its peers and competitors for data privacy and protection. Companies today digitally manage vast amounts of personal information about their clients. A company’s score on this issue is based on the systems, products and procedures it has in place to minimize the risk for data and privacy breaches.
Consumer Health, Wellness & Safety — N/A

First Foundation compared to its peers and competitors Companies in this category manage its product and safety risks.
Employee Ownership, Satisfaction, Benefits & Pay — N/A

First Foundation among its peers for employee satisfaction and pay. A company’s score on this issue depends on its frequency and likelihood of labor disputes as well as its practices to keep and retain talent - such as compensation, family leave, employee health care and other benefits. Employers that are rated as good to work for consistently produce higher stock returns than their peers.
Workplace Health and Safety — N/A

First Foundation among its competitors on this issue. A company’s workplace health and safety is evaluated not only by the number of accidents and injuries in the workplace, but also by their safety policies, training procedures, and their investment in equipment that can reduce accidents.
Integrity of Corporate Governance — N/A

First Foundation among its competitors on corporate governance. This score is determined by the company’s accounting practices, executive pay, board organization and ownership structure.
Ethical Practices — N/A

First Foundation compared to its peers and competitors. A company’s rating on this issue is based on its history of controversies related to unethical corporate behavior, such as false claims about their products, price fixing, executive misconduct, insider trading or fraudulent practices.
Usage of Conflict Materials — N/A

First Foundation among its competitors in this category. Certain products use raw materials that are commonly sourced from militias or other organizations that promote or engage in conflict in their region. To perform well in this category companies must provide adequate assurances that any of these metals used in their production are in fact from conflict-free sources.
Forced Labor — N/A

First Foundation compared to its competitors on forced labor. A company’s score on this issue depends on its use of forced labor and on its work conditions for outsourced labor.
Diversity of Corporate Leadership 2 N/A

First Foundation performs poorly based on its peers as well as companies in similar geographic regions. Companies are assessed on factors such as board diversity and senior management diversity. Companies performing well on this issue typically are more profitable than its peers, while companies with very poor scores typically have greater stock price volatility and lower returns on capital.

First Foundation - Competitors and Related Companies

How First Foundation stacks up to its peers in the Regional Banks industry or with competing business segments.