GMS

NYS:GMS

Home Improvement Chains

Market Cap

$851.64mm

SMALL cap

Share Price ↑

$20.68 (0.49%)

YTD Return ↑

31.8037%

since start of 2019

P/E Ratio

13.88

GMS chart by TradingView

Source: FactSet financial data and analytics.

Corporate Values

Carbon Footprint
Pollution Prevention
Water Conservation
Data Privacy
Consumer Health
Employee Satisfaction
Workplace Safety
Corp Gov
Ethical Practices
Conflict Materials
Forced Labor
Gender Diversity

Legend

About

Home Improvement Chains Founded 1971

GMS, Inc. is a distributor of wallboard and suspended ceilings systems and complementary interior construction products. Its products include accessories, acoustical ceilings, drywall, fiberglass reinforced panels, insulation, joint treatment, steel studs, and tools. The company was founded by Richard K. Mueller and Richard A. Whitcomb in 1971 and is headquartered in Tucker, GA.

website

Source: FactSet Research Systems

Headquarters

100 Crescent Centre Parkway

Suite 800

Tucker, GA 30084

1.800.392.4619

Executives

Name	Title	Gender
Howard Douglas Goforth, CPA	Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer & VP	Male
Craig D. Apolinsky	Secretary, Vice President & General Counsel	Male
G. Michael Callahan, Jr.	President, Chief Executive Officer & Director	Male
Richard K. Mueller	Chairman	Male
Richard A. Whitcomb	Founder	Male
Richard Alan Adams, CPA	Senior Vice President-Operations	Male
Khara L. Julien	Vice President-Human Resources	Male

Mindful Investing Summary

Legend

Carbon Footprint — N/A

GMS among its competitors for its carbon footprint. A company’s performance in this category is based on its success in implementing energy efficiency measures. Investments in energy efficient technology, green building and sourcing of renewable energy can all lead to cost savings and reduce the company’s contribution to climate change.
Pollution Prevention — N/A

GMS on this issue. Companies are evaluated on pollution prevention by the levels of waste (including hazardous waste) they produce and release into the environment, and can be affected by whether they develop products that can reduce exposure to pollution.
Water Conservation — N/A

GMS among its peers in this category. A company’s score in this category depends on its measures to minimize water usage and impacts on stressed or drought-prone water resources.
Data & Privacy Protection — N/A

GMS among its peers and competitors for data privacy and protection. Companies today digitally manage vast amounts of personal information about their clients. A company’s score on this issue is based on the systems, products and procedures it has in place to minimize the risk for data and privacy breaches.
Consumer Health, Wellness & Safety — N/A

GMS compared to its peers and competitors Companies in this category manage its product and safety risks.
Employee Ownership, Satisfaction, Benefits & Pay — N/A

GMS among its peers for employee satisfaction and pay. A company’s score on this issue depends on its frequency and likelihood of labor disputes as well as its practices to keep and retain talent - such as compensation, family leave, employee health care and other benefits. Employers that are rated as good to work for consistently produce higher stock returns than their peers.
Workplace Health and Safety — N/A

GMS among its competitors on this issue. A company’s workplace health and safety is evaluated not only by the number of accidents and injuries in the workplace, but also by their safety policies, training procedures, and their investment in equipment that can reduce accidents.
Integrity of Corporate Governance — N/A

GMS among its competitors on corporate governance. This score is determined by the company’s accounting practices, executive pay, board organization and ownership structure.
Ethical Practices — N/A

GMS compared to its peers and competitors. A company’s rating on this issue is based on its history of controversies related to unethical corporate behavior, such as false claims about their products, price fixing, executive misconduct, insider trading or fraudulent practices.
Usage of Conflict Materials — N/A

GMS among its competitors in this category. Certain products use raw materials that are commonly sourced from militias or other organizations that promote or engage in conflict in their region. To perform well in this category companies must provide adequate assurances that any of these metals used in their production are in fact from conflict-free sources.
Forced Labor — N/A

GMS compared to its competitors on forced labor. A company’s score on this issue depends on its use of forced labor and on its work conditions for outsourced labor.
Diversity of Corporate Leadership 1 N/A

GMS performs very poorly based on its peers as well as companies in similar geographic regions. Companies are assessed on factors such as board diversity and senior management diversity. Companies performing well on this issue typically are more profitable than its peers, while companies with very poor scores typically have greater stock price volatility and lower returns on capital.

GMS - Competitors and Related Companies

How GMS stacks up to its peers in the Home Improvement Chains industry or with competing business segments.

GMS

NYS:GMS

Home Improvement Chains

Market Cap

$851.64mm

SMALL cap

Share Price ↑

$20.68 (0.49%)

YTD Return ↑

31.8037%

since start of 2019

P/E Ratio

13.88

GMS chart by TradingView

Source: FactSet financial data and analytics.

Corporate Values

Carbon Footprint
Pollution Prevention
Water Conservation
Data Privacy
Consumer Health
Employee Satisfaction
Workplace Safety
Corp Gov
Ethical Practices
Conflict Materials
Forced Labor
Gender Diversity

Legend

Loading…