Green Dot

NYS:GDOT

Finance/Rental/Leasing

Market Cap

$3.56bn

MID cap

Share Price ↑

$67.50 (0.45%)

YTD Return ↓

-13.8261%

since start of 2019

P/E Ratio

41.67

GDOT chart by TradingView

Source: FactSet financial data and analytics.

Corporate Values

Carbon Footprint
Pollution Prevention
Water Conservation
Data Privacy
Consumer Health
Employee Satisfaction
Workplace Safety
Corp Gov
Ethical Practices
Conflict Materials
Forced Labor
Gender Diversity

Legend

About

Finance/Rental/Leasing Founded 1999

Green Dot Corp. is a technology-centric, pro-consumer bank holding company. The company provides prepaid debit card products and prepaid card reloading services in the United States. It also provides mobile technology and mobile banking with its GoBank mobile checking account. The company products and services are available to consumers at retail locations, thousands of neighborhood financial service center locations, online, in the leading app stores. Green Dot was founded by Steven W. Streit in October 1, 1999 and is headquartered in Pasadena, CA.

website

Source: FactSet Research Systems

Headquarters

3465 East Foothill Boulevard

Pasadena, CA 91107-6071

1.626.765.2000

Executives

Name	Title	Gender
William I. Jacobs	Chairman	Male
Steven W. Streit	President, Chief Executive Officer & Director	Male
John C. Ricci	Secretary & General Counsel	Male
Mark L. Shifke	Chief Financial Officer	Male
Kuan Archer, MBA	Chief Operating Officer	Male

Mindful Investing Summary

Legend

Carbon Footprint — N/A

Green Dot among its competitors for its carbon footprint. A company’s performance in this category is based on its success in implementing energy efficiency measures. Investments in energy efficient technology, green building and sourcing of renewable energy can all lead to cost savings and reduce the company’s contribution to climate change.
Pollution Prevention — N/A

Green Dot on this issue. Companies are evaluated on pollution prevention by the levels of waste (including hazardous waste) they produce and release into the environment, and can be affected by whether they develop products that can reduce exposure to pollution.
Water Conservation — N/A

Green Dot among its peers in this category. A company’s score in this category depends on its measures to minimize water usage and impacts on stressed or drought-prone water resources.
Data & Privacy Protection — N/A

Green Dot among its peers and competitors for data privacy and protection. Companies today digitally manage vast amounts of personal information about their clients. A company’s score on this issue is based on the systems, products and procedures it has in place to minimize the risk for data and privacy breaches.
Consumer Health, Wellness & Safety — N/A

Green Dot compared to its peers and competitors Companies in this category manage its product and safety risks.
Employee Ownership, Satisfaction, Benefits & Pay — N/A

Green Dot among its peers for employee satisfaction and pay. A company’s score on this issue depends on its frequency and likelihood of labor disputes as well as its practices to keep and retain talent - such as compensation, family leave, employee health care and other benefits. Employers that are rated as good to work for consistently produce higher stock returns than their peers.
Workplace Health and Safety — N/A

Green Dot among its competitors on this issue. A company’s workplace health and safety is evaluated not only by the number of accidents and injuries in the workplace, but also by their safety policies, training procedures, and their investment in equipment that can reduce accidents.
Integrity of Corporate Governance — N/A

Green Dot among its competitors on corporate governance. This score is determined by the company’s accounting practices, executive pay, board organization and ownership structure.
Ethical Practices — N/A

Green Dot compared to its peers and competitors. A company’s rating on this issue is based on its history of controversies related to unethical corporate behavior, such as false claims about their products, price fixing, executive misconduct, insider trading or fraudulent practices.
Usage of Conflict Materials — N/A

Green Dot among its competitors in this category. Certain products use raw materials that are commonly sourced from militias or other organizations that promote or engage in conflict in their region. To perform well in this category companies must provide adequate assurances that any of these metals used in their production are in fact from conflict-free sources.
Forced Labor — N/A

Green Dot compared to its competitors on forced labor. A company’s score on this issue depends on its use of forced labor and on its work conditions for outsourced labor.
Diversity of Corporate Leadership 2 N/A

Green Dot performs poorly based on its peers as well as companies in similar geographic regions. Companies are assessed on factors such as board diversity and senior management diversity. Companies performing well on this issue typically are more profitable than its peers, while companies with very poor scores typically have greater stock price volatility and lower returns on capital.

Green Dot - Competitors and Related Companies

How Green Dot stacks up to its peers in the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry or with competing business segments.

Green Dot

NYS:GDOT

Finance/Rental/Leasing

Market Cap

$3.56bn

MID cap

Share Price ↑

$67.50 (0.45%)

YTD Return ↓

-13.8261%

since start of 2019

P/E Ratio

41.67

GDOT chart by TradingView

Source: FactSet financial data and analytics.

Corporate Values

Carbon Footprint
Pollution Prevention
Water Conservation
Data Privacy
Consumer Health
Employee Satisfaction
Workplace Safety
Corp Gov
Ethical Practices
Conflict Materials
Forced Labor
Gender Diversity

Legend

Loading…