M.D.C.

NYS:MDC

Homebuilding

Market Cap

$1.90bn

SMALL cap

Share Price ↓

$30.41 (-1.65%)

YTD Return ↑

17.9617%

since start of 2019

P/E Ratio

8.94

MDC chart by TradingView

Source: FactSet financial data and analytics.

Corporate Values

Carbon Footprint
Pollution Prevention
Water Conservation
Data Privacy
Consumer Health
Employee Satisfaction
Workplace Safety
Corp Gov
Ethical Practices
Conflict Materials
Forced Labor
Gender Diversity

Legend

About

Homebuilding Founded 1972

M.D.C. Holdings, Inc. provides homebuilding and financial services. Its homebuilding operations consist of wholly owned subsidiary companies that generally purchase finished lots or develop lots to the extent necessary for the construction and sale primarily of single-family detached homes to first-time and first-time move-up homebuyers under the name Richmond American Homes. The company's financial services operations consist of mortgage loans, insurance coverage, re-insures Allegiant claims; third-party insurance products, and title agency services. M.D.C. Holdings was founded by Larry A. Mizel in 1972 and is headquartered in Denver, CO.

website

Source: FactSet Research Systems

Headquarters

4350 South Monaco Street

Suite 500

Denver, CO 80237

1.303.773.1100

Executives

Name	Title	Gender
Larry A. Mizel	Chairman & Chief Executive Officer	Male
David D. Mandarich	President, Chief Operating Officer & Director	Male
Michael Touff	Senior Vice President & General Counsel	Male
John J. Heaney	Treasurer & Senior Vice President	Male
Joseph H. Fretz	Secretary & Corporate Counsel	Male
Karen Gard	Chief Human Resources Officer & Vice President	Female
Robert Nathaniel Martin, CFA, CPA	Chief Financial Officer & Senior Vice President	Male
Steven B. Chotin	Founder	Male
Kelly Taga	Chief Information Officer & Vice President	Male

Mindful Investing Summary

Legend

Carbon Footprint — N/A

M.D.C. among its competitors for its carbon footprint. A company’s performance in this category is based on its success in implementing energy efficiency measures. Investments in energy efficient technology, green building and sourcing of renewable energy can all lead to cost savings and reduce the company’s contribution to climate change.
Pollution Prevention — N/A

M.D.C. on this issue. Companies are evaluated on pollution prevention by the levels of waste (including hazardous waste) they produce and release into the environment, and can be affected by whether they develop products that can reduce exposure to pollution.
Water Conservation — N/A

M.D.C. among its peers in this category. A company’s score in this category depends on its measures to minimize water usage and impacts on stressed or drought-prone water resources.
Data & Privacy Protection — N/A

M.D.C. among its peers and competitors for data privacy and protection. Companies today digitally manage vast amounts of personal information about their clients. A company’s score on this issue is based on the systems, products and procedures it has in place to minimize the risk for data and privacy breaches.
Consumer Health, Wellness & Safety — N/A

M.D.C. compared to its peers and competitors Companies in this category manage its product and safety risks.
Employee Ownership, Satisfaction, Benefits & Pay — N/A

M.D.C. among its peers for employee satisfaction and pay. A company’s score on this issue depends on its frequency and likelihood of labor disputes as well as its practices to keep and retain talent - such as compensation, family leave, employee health care and other benefits. Employers that are rated as good to work for consistently produce higher stock returns than their peers.
Workplace Health and Safety — N/A

M.D.C. among its competitors on this issue. A company’s workplace health and safety is evaluated not only by the number of accidents and injuries in the workplace, but also by their safety policies, training procedures, and their investment in equipment that can reduce accidents.
Integrity of Corporate Governance — N/A

M.D.C. among its competitors on corporate governance. This score is determined by the company’s accounting practices, executive pay, board organization and ownership structure.
Ethical Practices — N/A

M.D.C. compared to its peers and competitors. A company’s rating on this issue is based on its history of controversies related to unethical corporate behavior, such as false claims about their products, price fixing, executive misconduct, insider trading or fraudulent practices.
Usage of Conflict Materials — N/A

M.D.C. among its competitors in this category. Certain products use raw materials that are commonly sourced from militias or other organizations that promote or engage in conflict in their region. To perform well in this category companies must provide adequate assurances that any of these metals used in their production are in fact from conflict-free sources.
Forced Labor — N/A

M.D.C. compared to its competitors on forced labor. A company’s score on this issue depends on its use of forced labor and on its work conditions for outsourced labor.
Diversity of Corporate Leadership 2 N/A

M.D.C. performs poorly based on its peers as well as companies in similar geographic regions. Companies are assessed on factors such as board diversity and senior management diversity. Companies performing well on this issue typically are more profitable than its peers, while companies with very poor scores typically have greater stock price volatility and lower returns on capital.

M.D.C. - Competitors and Related Companies

How M.D.C. stacks up to its peers in the Homebuilding industry or with competing business segments.

M.D.C.

NYS:MDC

Homebuilding

Market Cap

$1.90bn

SMALL cap

Share Price ↓

$30.41 (-1.65%)

YTD Return ↑

17.9617%

since start of 2019

P/E Ratio

8.94

MDC chart by TradingView

Source: FactSet financial data and analytics.

Corporate Values

Carbon Footprint
Pollution Prevention
Water Conservation
Data Privacy
Consumer Health
Employee Satisfaction
Workplace Safety
Corp Gov
Ethical Practices
Conflict Materials
Forced Labor
Gender Diversity

Legend

Loading…