Medical Properties Trust

NYS:MPW

Real Estate Investment Trusts

Market Cap

$6.56bn

MID cap

Share Price ↑

$17.53 (1.80%)

YTD Return ↑

11.7029%

since start of 2019

P/E Ratio

6.37

MPW chart by TradingView

Source: FactSet financial data and analytics.

Corporate Values

Carbon Footprint
Pollution Prevention
Water Conservation
Data Privacy
Consumer Health
Employee Satisfaction
Workplace Safety
Corp Gov
Ethical Practices
Conflict Materials
Forced Labor
Gender Diversity

Legend

About

Real Estate Investment Trusts Founded 2003

Medical Properties Trust, Inc. is a self-advised real estate investment trust formed to focus on investing in and owning net-leased healthcare facilities across the United States of America and selective foreign countries. Its activities include acquisition and development of healthcare facilities and lease the facilities to healthcare operating companies under long-term net leases. It also involved in mortgage loans to healthcare operators collateralized by their real estate assets. The company was founded by Edward K. Aldag Jr., R. Steven Hamner, Emmett E McLean, and William G. McKenzie on August 27, 2003 and is headquartered in Birmingham, AL.

website

Source: FactSet Research Systems

Headquarters

1000 Urban Center Drive

Suite 501

Birmingham, AL 35242

1.205.969.3755

Executives

Name	Title	Gender
R. Steven Hamner, CPA	Chief Financial Officer, Director & Executive VP	Male
Edward K. Aldag, Jr.	Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer	Male
Gil McKenzie	Vice Chairman	Male
Emmett E. McLean, MBA	COO, Secretary, Treasurer & Executive VP	Male
Tim Berryman	Director-Investor Relations	Male

Mindful Investing Summary

Legend

Carbon Footprint — N/A

Medical Properties Trust among its competitors for its carbon footprint. A company’s performance in this category is based on its success in implementing energy efficiency measures. Investments in energy efficient technology, green building and sourcing of renewable energy can all lead to cost savings and reduce the company’s contribution to climate change.
Pollution Prevention — N/A

Medical Properties Trust on this issue. Companies are evaluated on pollution prevention by the levels of waste (including hazardous waste) they produce and release into the environment, and can be affected by whether they develop products that can reduce exposure to pollution.
Water Conservation — N/A

Medical Properties Trust among its peers in this category. A company’s score in this category depends on its measures to minimize water usage and impacts on stressed or drought-prone water resources.
Data & Privacy Protection — N/A

Medical Properties Trust among its peers and competitors for data privacy and protection. Companies today digitally manage vast amounts of personal information about their clients. A company’s score on this issue is based on the systems, products and procedures it has in place to minimize the risk for data and privacy breaches.
Consumer Health, Wellness & Safety — N/A

Medical Properties Trust compared to its peers and competitors Companies in this category manage its product and safety risks.
Employee Ownership, Satisfaction, Benefits & Pay — N/A

Medical Properties Trust among its peers for employee satisfaction and pay. A company’s score on this issue depends on its frequency and likelihood of labor disputes as well as its practices to keep and retain talent - such as compensation, family leave, employee health care and other benefits. Employers that are rated as good to work for consistently produce higher stock returns than their peers.
Workplace Health and Safety — N/A

Medical Properties Trust among its competitors on this issue. A company’s workplace health and safety is evaluated not only by the number of accidents and injuries in the workplace, but also by their safety policies, training procedures, and their investment in equipment that can reduce accidents.
Integrity of Corporate Governance — N/A

Medical Properties Trust among its competitors on corporate governance. This score is determined by the company’s accounting practices, executive pay, board organization and ownership structure.
Ethical Practices — N/A

Medical Properties Trust compared to its peers and competitors. A company’s rating on this issue is based on its history of controversies related to unethical corporate behavior, such as false claims about their products, price fixing, executive misconduct, insider trading or fraudulent practices.
Usage of Conflict Materials — N/A

Medical Properties Trust among its competitors in this category. Certain products use raw materials that are commonly sourced from militias or other organizations that promote or engage in conflict in their region. To perform well in this category companies must provide adequate assurances that any of these metals used in their production are in fact from conflict-free sources.
Forced Labor — N/A

Medical Properties Trust compared to its competitors on forced labor. A company’s score on this issue depends on its use of forced labor and on its work conditions for outsourced labor.
Diversity of Corporate Leadership 2 N/A

Medical Properties Trust performs poorly based on its peers as well as companies in similar geographic regions. Companies are assessed on factors such as board diversity and senior management diversity. Companies performing well on this issue typically are more profitable than its peers, while companies with very poor scores typically have greater stock price volatility and lower returns on capital.

Medical Properties Trust - Competitors and Related Companies

How Medical Properties Trust stacks up to its peers in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry or with competing business segments.