Medicines

NAS:MDCO

Pharmaceuticals: Other

Market Cap

—

MID cap

Share Price ←

(—)

YTD Return ←

—

since start of 2019

P/E Ratio

—

MDCO chart by TradingView

Source: FactSet financial data and analytics.

Corporate Values

Carbon Footprint
Pollution Prevention
Water Conservation
Data Privacy
Consumer Health
Employee Satisfaction
Workplace Safety
Corp Gov
Ethical Practices
Conflict Materials
Forced Labor
Gender Diversity

Legend

About

Pharmaceuticals: Other Founded 1996

The Medicines Co. is a biopharmaceutical company, which focuses on saving lives, alleviating suffering and contributing to the economics of healthcare by focusing on leading acute and intensive care hospitals worldwide. The company markets its brands Angiomax, Cleviprex, injectable emulsion, Ionsys, Kengreal, Minocin for injection, and Orbactiv. The company was founded by Clive A. Meanwell, Helmut Giersiefen, John W. Villiger and T. Scott Johnson on July 31, 1996 and is headquartered in Parsippany, NJ.

website

Source: FactSet Research Systems

Headquarters

8 Sylvan Way

Parsippany, NJ 07054-3801

1.973.290.6000

Executives

Name	Title	Gender
Loretta M. Itri, MD	EVP-Global Health Science & Regulatory Affairs	Female
Tony Kingsley, MBA	President & Chief Operating Officer	Male
Bill O'Connor, CPA	SVP, Chief Financial & Accounting Officer	Male
Fred Eshelman, PhD	Non-Executive Chairman	Male
Clive A. Meanwell, MD, PhD	Chief Executive Officer & Director	Male
John W. Villiger, PhD	Executive Vice President	Male
T. Scott Johnson, MD	Founder	Male
Helmut Giersiefen, PhD	Founder	Male
Krishna Gorti, MD	Vice President-Investor Relations	Male
David Kallend, Phd	Vice President & Global Medical Director	Male
Stephen M. Rodin	Secretary, Senior Vice President & General Counsel	Male

Mindful Investing Summary

Legend

Carbon Footprint — N/A

Medicines among its competitors for its carbon footprint. A company’s performance in this category is based on its success in implementing energy efficiency measures. Investments in energy efficient technology, green building and sourcing of renewable energy can all lead to cost savings and reduce the company’s contribution to climate change.
Pollution Prevention — N/A

Medicines on this issue. Companies are evaluated on pollution prevention by the levels of waste (including hazardous waste) they produce and release into the environment, and can be affected by whether they develop products that can reduce exposure to pollution.
Water Conservation — N/A

Medicines among its peers in this category. A company’s score in this category depends on its measures to minimize water usage and impacts on stressed or drought-prone water resources.
Data & Privacy Protection — N/A

Medicines among its peers and competitors for data privacy and protection. Companies today digitally manage vast amounts of personal information about their clients. A company’s score on this issue is based on the systems, products and procedures it has in place to minimize the risk for data and privacy breaches.
Consumer Health, Wellness & Safety — N/A

Medicines compared to its peers and competitors Companies in this category manage its product and safety risks.
Employee Ownership, Satisfaction, Benefits & Pay — N/A

Medicines among its peers for employee satisfaction and pay. A company’s score on this issue depends on its frequency and likelihood of labor disputes as well as its practices to keep and retain talent - such as compensation, family leave, employee health care and other benefits. Employers that are rated as good to work for consistently produce higher stock returns than their peers.
Workplace Health and Safety — N/A

Medicines among its competitors on this issue. A company’s workplace health and safety is evaluated not only by the number of accidents and injuries in the workplace, but also by their safety policies, training procedures, and their investment in equipment that can reduce accidents.
Integrity of Corporate Governance — N/A

Medicines among its competitors on corporate governance. This score is determined by the company’s accounting practices, executive pay, board organization and ownership structure.
Ethical Practices — N/A

Medicines compared to its peers and competitors. A company’s rating on this issue is based on its history of controversies related to unethical corporate behavior, such as false claims about their products, price fixing, executive misconduct, insider trading or fraudulent practices.
Usage of Conflict Materials — N/A

Medicines among its competitors in this category. Certain products use raw materials that are commonly sourced from militias or other organizations that promote or engage in conflict in their region. To perform well in this category companies must provide adequate assurances that any of these metals used in their production are in fact from conflict-free sources.
Forced Labor — N/A

Medicines compared to its competitors on forced labor. A company’s score on this issue depends on its use of forced labor and on its work conditions for outsourced labor.
Diversity of Corporate Leadership 2 N/A

Medicines performs poorly based on its peers as well as companies in similar geographic regions. Companies are assessed on factors such as board diversity and senior management diversity. Companies performing well on this issue typically are more profitable than its peers, while companies with very poor scores typically have greater stock price volatility and lower returns on capital.

Medicines - Competitors and Related Companies

How Medicines stacks up to its peers in the Pharmaceuticals: Other industry or with competing business segments.

Medicines

NAS:MDCO

Pharmaceuticals: Other

Market Cap

—

MID cap

Share Price ←

(—)

YTD Return ←

—

since start of 2019

P/E Ratio

—

MDCO chart by TradingView

Source: FactSet financial data and analytics.

Corporate Values

Carbon Footprint
Pollution Prevention
Water Conservation
Data Privacy
Consumer Health
Employee Satisfaction
Workplace Safety
Corp Gov
Ethical Practices
Conflict Materials
Forced Labor
Gender Diversity

Legend

Loading…