Quotient Technology

NYS:QUOT

Advertising/Marketing Services

Market Cap

$969.03mm

SMALL cap

Share Price ↑

$10.18 (1.19%)

YTD Return ↓

-4.5028%

since start of 2019

P/E Ratio

—

QUOT chart by TradingView

Source: FactSet financial data and analytics.

Corporate Values

Carbon Footprint
Pollution Prevention
Water Conservation
Data Privacy
Consumer Health
Employee Satisfaction
Workplace Safety
Corp Gov
Ethical Practices
Conflict Materials
Forced Labor
Gender Diversity

Legend

About

Advertising/Marketing Services Founded 1998

Quotient Technology, Inc. engages in the operation of a digital promotion platform that connects great brands and retailers with consumers through web, mobile and social channels. It is transforming the multi-billion dollar promotions industry into the digital world. The company offers digital printable coupons, digital paperless coupons, coupon codes and other promotions. Quotient Technology was founded by Steven R. Boal in May 1998 and is headquartered in Mountain View, CA.

website

Source: FactSet Research Systems

Headquarters

400 Logue Avenue

Mountain View, CA 94043-4019

1.650.605.4600

Executives

Name	Title	Gender
Ronald J. Fior	Chief Financial Officer	Male
Steven R. Boal	Chief Executive Officer & Director	Male
Michael Roger Walsh	Chief Security Officer	Male
Mir Aamir, MBA	President, Chief Operating Officer & Director	Male
Stacie Clements	Vice President-Investor Relations	Female
Connie Chen	Secretary, Chief Legal Officer & General Counsel	Female
Michael Bourque	Vice President-Human Resources	Male

Mindful Investing Summary

Legend

Carbon Footprint — N/A

Quotient Technology among its competitors for its carbon footprint. A company’s performance in this category is based on its success in implementing energy efficiency measures. Investments in energy efficient technology, green building and sourcing of renewable energy can all lead to cost savings and reduce the company’s contribution to climate change.
Pollution Prevention — N/A

Quotient Technology on this issue. Companies are evaluated on pollution prevention by the levels of waste (including hazardous waste) they produce and release into the environment, and can be affected by whether they develop products that can reduce exposure to pollution.
Water Conservation — N/A

Quotient Technology among its peers in this category. A company’s score in this category depends on its measures to minimize water usage and impacts on stressed or drought-prone water resources.
Data & Privacy Protection — N/A

Quotient Technology among its peers and competitors for data privacy and protection. Companies today digitally manage vast amounts of personal information about their clients. A company’s score on this issue is based on the systems, products and procedures it has in place to minimize the risk for data and privacy breaches.
Consumer Health, Wellness & Safety — N/A

Quotient Technology compared to its peers and competitors Companies in this category manage its product and safety risks.
Employee Ownership, Satisfaction, Benefits & Pay — N/A

Quotient Technology among its peers for employee satisfaction and pay. A company’s score on this issue depends on its frequency and likelihood of labor disputes as well as its practices to keep and retain talent - such as compensation, family leave, employee health care and other benefits. Employers that are rated as good to work for consistently produce higher stock returns than their peers.
Workplace Health and Safety — N/A

Quotient Technology among its competitors on this issue. A company’s workplace health and safety is evaluated not only by the number of accidents and injuries in the workplace, but also by their safety policies, training procedures, and their investment in equipment that can reduce accidents.
Integrity of Corporate Governance — N/A

Quotient Technology among its competitors on corporate governance. This score is determined by the company’s accounting practices, executive pay, board organization and ownership structure.
Ethical Practices — N/A

Quotient Technology compared to its peers and competitors. A company’s rating on this issue is based on its history of controversies related to unethical corporate behavior, such as false claims about their products, price fixing, executive misconduct, insider trading or fraudulent practices.
Usage of Conflict Materials — N/A

Quotient Technology among its competitors in this category. Certain products use raw materials that are commonly sourced from militias or other organizations that promote or engage in conflict in their region. To perform well in this category companies must provide adequate assurances that any of these metals used in their production are in fact from conflict-free sources.
Forced Labor — N/A

Quotient Technology compared to its competitors on forced labor. A company’s score on this issue depends on its use of forced labor and on its work conditions for outsourced labor.
Diversity of Corporate Leadership 3 N/A

Quotient Technology is an average performer based on its peers as well as companies in similar geographic regions. Companies are assessed on factors such as board diversity and senior management diversity. Companies performing well on this issue typically are more profitable than its peers, while companies with very poor scores typically have greater stock price volatility and lower returns on capital.

Quotient Technology - Competitors and Related Companies

How Quotient Technology stacks up to its peers in the Advertising/Marketing Services industry or with competing business segments.