Wave Life Sciences

NAS:WVE

Biotechnology

Market Cap

$912.93mm

SMALL cap

Share Price ↑

$27.37 (2.51%)

YTD Return ↓

-34.8939%

since start of 2019

P/E Ratio

—

WVE chart by TradingView

Source: FactSet financial data and analytics.

Corporate Values

Carbon Footprint
Pollution Prevention
Water Conservation
Data Privacy
Consumer Health
Employee Satisfaction
Workplace Safety
Corp Gov
Ethical Practices
Conflict Materials
Forced Labor
Gender Diversity

Legend

About

Biotechnology Founded 2012

Wave Life Sciences Ltd. operates as a preclinical biopharmaceutical company, which engages in the development and provision of nucleic acid therapeutics. The company was founded by Gregory L. Verdine and Takeshi Wada on July 23, 2012 and is headquartered in Cambridge, MA.

website

Source: FactSet Research Systems

Headquarters

Marina One East Tower

7 Straits View

Suite 12-00

Singapore, Central Singapore 018936

65..6236.3388

Executives

Name	Title	Gender
Gregory L. Verdine, PhD	Chairman	Male
Paul B. Bolno, MD, MBA	President, Chief Executive Officer & Director	Male
Keith Regnante, MBA	Chief Financial Officer	Male
Linda K. Rockett	General Counsel	Female
Takeshi Wada	Founder	Male
Peter Lasky	Chief Human Resources Officer & Senior VP	Male

Mindful Investing Summary

Legend

Carbon Footprint — N/A

Wave Life Sciences among its competitors for its carbon footprint. A company’s performance in this category is based on its success in implementing energy efficiency measures. Investments in energy efficient technology, green building and sourcing of renewable energy can all lead to cost savings and reduce the company’s contribution to climate change.
Pollution Prevention — N/A

Wave Life Sciences on this issue. Companies are evaluated on pollution prevention by the levels of waste (including hazardous waste) they produce and release into the environment, and can be affected by whether they develop products that can reduce exposure to pollution.
Water Conservation — N/A

Wave Life Sciences among its peers in this category. A company’s score in this category depends on its measures to minimize water usage and impacts on stressed or drought-prone water resources.
Data & Privacy Protection — N/A

Wave Life Sciences among its peers and competitors for data privacy and protection. Companies today digitally manage vast amounts of personal information about their clients. A company’s score on this issue is based on the systems, products and procedures it has in place to minimize the risk for data and privacy breaches.
Consumer Health, Wellness & Safety — N/A

Wave Life Sciences compared to its peers and competitors Companies in this category manage its product and safety risks.
Employee Ownership, Satisfaction, Benefits & Pay — N/A

Wave Life Sciences among its peers for employee satisfaction and pay. A company’s score on this issue depends on its frequency and likelihood of labor disputes as well as its practices to keep and retain talent - such as compensation, family leave, employee health care and other benefits. Employers that are rated as good to work for consistently produce higher stock returns than their peers.
Workplace Health and Safety — N/A

Wave Life Sciences among its competitors on this issue. A company’s workplace health and safety is evaluated not only by the number of accidents and injuries in the workplace, but also by their safety policies, training procedures, and their investment in equipment that can reduce accidents.
Integrity of Corporate Governance — N/A

Wave Life Sciences among its competitors on corporate governance. This score is determined by the company’s accounting practices, executive pay, board organization and ownership structure.
Ethical Practices — N/A

Wave Life Sciences compared to its peers and competitors. A company’s rating on this issue is based on its history of controversies related to unethical corporate behavior, such as false claims about their products, price fixing, executive misconduct, insider trading or fraudulent practices.
Usage of Conflict Materials — N/A

Wave Life Sciences among its competitors in this category. Certain products use raw materials that are commonly sourced from militias or other organizations that promote or engage in conflict in their region. To perform well in this category companies must provide adequate assurances that any of these metals used in their production are in fact from conflict-free sources.
Forced Labor — N/A

Wave Life Sciences compared to its competitors on forced labor. A company’s score on this issue depends on its use of forced labor and on its work conditions for outsourced labor.
Diversity of Corporate Leadership 1 N/A

Wave Life Sciences performs very poorly based on its peers as well as companies in similar geographic regions. Companies are assessed on factors such as board diversity and senior management diversity. Companies performing well on this issue typically are more profitable than its peers, while companies with very poor scores typically have greater stock price volatility and lower returns on capital.

Wave Life Sciences - Competitors and Related Companies

How Wave Life Sciences stacks up to its peers in the Biotechnology industry or with competing business segments.